The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has completed its formal review of the Help to Buy equity loan scheme and concluded it delivered very high value for money. The finding, reported by Professional Builders Merchant, arrives at a time when the housebuilding sector is under pressure and trade professionals dependent on new-build activity are watching government housing policy closely.
---
What Help to Buy Did
The Help to Buy equity loan scheme allowed first-time buyers to purchase a new-build home with a smaller deposit by taking a government equity loan of up to 20% of the purchase price (40% in London). The buyer needed only a 5% deposit and took out a standard repayment mortgage on the remaining share.
For housebuilders and the trades that support them, the scheme was a significant demand driver. New-build completions on sites using Help to Buy needed joiners, plumbers, electricians, plasterers, landscapers, and all the associated supply of materials from builders' merchants.
The scheme closed to new applications in March 2023. The government review now being published is the retrospective assessment of whether the scheme achieved its objectives.
---
What the Review Found
The MHCLG review concludes the scheme provided very high value for money, meaning the economic and social benefits it generated are judged to outweigh its costs to the public purse. The specifics of how that calculation was made, including how many homes were built, how many buyers were enabled, and what the economic multiplier effect was through the construction supply chain, are part of the formal review documentation.
The finding matters to the sector because it provides a policy basis for whatever comes next. If Help to Buy is officially judged to have worked, the argument for a successor scheme is strengthened.
---
What It Means for Trades and Builders Merchants
The scheme's closure has contributed to a slower new-build pipeline in some areas of the market. First-time buyer demand for new-build homes without a government-backed loan product has proved harder to sustain, particularly at a time when mortgage rates remain above the historic lows of the 2010s.
A positive retrospective verdict on Help to Buy does not immediately restart the pipeline. But it does provide a clearer case for government intervention to support the new-build market, whether through a direct successor scheme, expanded shared ownership, or other mechanisms.
For builders' merchants, material suppliers, and the trades working primarily on new-build sites, the policy direction matters as much as individual site starts. A scheme that unlocks first-time buyer demand generates a predictable flow of work that cascades through the entire supply chain.
---
What Comes Next
The National Federation of Builders and other trade bodies have consistently called for meaningful housebuilding incentives to replace the schemes that have closed or wound down. The government review giving Help to Buy a strong verdict strengthens their argument but does not itself announce a replacement.
The political and economic context for a new scheme is different now than when Help to Buy launched in 2013. Affordability pressures, land supply constraints, and the broader planning reform agenda all intersect with what a successor product might look like.
Trades working on new-build should monitor the autumn spending review and any housing-related announcements through the remainder of 2026 for signals about what replaces Help to Buy in practical terms.
---
Is Help to Buy still available?
What replaced Help to Buy?
Why does Help to Buy matter to trades?
What does 'very high value for money' mean in government assessment terms?
Source
- Professional Builders Merchant: Government review concludes that Help to Buy scheme provided 'very high' value for money
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) review, as cited